Agile teams often run into friction not only with management, but also with software architects. While managers are seen as too directive and control-oriented, architects are sometimes perceived as overly focused on stability, long-term consistency, or compliance concerns that can feel like brakes on fast delivery. From the architects’ perspective, however, self-organized teams may appear to underestimate long-term design implications, overlook cross-team coherence, or create technical debt by focusing too narrowly on short-term iterations.
Both sides carry valid concerns. Architects aim to safeguard system integrity, manage complexity, and ensure sustainable evolution. Agile teams, on the other hand, strive for autonomy, fast feedback, and adaptive learning. These intentions often collide: teams may feel constrained by architectural guardrails, while architects may feel sidelined from critical design decisions. The result is a cultural clash where mutual frustration overshadows the systemic value each role brings.
In this 40-minute talk, we explore these clashes at the interface of Agile, Management, and Architecture using one central tool: the Culture Clash Card. This reflection tool makes visible the underlying logics of different roles, highlights the systemic function of their behaviors, and guides structured dialogue toward constructive synthesis. We will show how the Culture Clash Card helps teams, managers, and architects surface tensions, reframe resistance, and co-create alternative patterns that balance agility with organizational needs.
Participants will leave with a systemic lens on culture clashes, a clear understanding of how to apply the Culture Clash Card, and concrete ideas for using it in their own contexts. This is not a story of winners and losers—it is a journey towards smarter collaboration across organizational logics.